Nearly there – delivering the Level 2 BIM tools. Will they be what we were expecting?
April 7, 2015 Leave a comment
We are just a few weeks away now from the first deliverables from the Innovate UK’s competition to deliver the last two key components of UK BIM Level 2 – a digital plan of work (dPoW) and an industry-wide classification system. The ‘soft’ launch is scheduled for the 8th April 2015 at the BIM Show Live event in Manchester, with the ‘hard’ launch planned for some time in June.
With the very short time frame for the work, the opportunities for consultation with the industry have been limited and what will be delivered will largely represent the views of NBS and the other project partners. There has been some dialogue with a group representing a number of the institutions and institutes, but it is not clear at this point how much influence they have had. Also, there have been a number of presentations and webinars over the last few months showing progress to date.
As you would expect, there has been a significant amount of feedback from the institutions’ body, including a CIBSE team from its BIM Group. The CIBSE team has tried to look at how these new tools will work throughout the life of the asset, and has looked wider than just the 3D modelling aspects of the output.
Three key issues have come to light with the classification structure being prepared. Firstly, it must be capable of classifying multi-services systems or elements. A good example would be a multi-services co-ordination drawing. Historically, classification systems such as Uniclass have only classified up to ‘types of systems’ – ventilation and air conditioning services and electrical power and lighting services are two such examples. Combining services in an application is common and the new classification system needs to be able to accommodate this.
Secondly, it is important to be able to classify things other than those associated with a 3D modelling environment. A wide variety of documents will be generated throughout the life of an asset and these all need to be classified in order to be stored and subsequently made available for reuse. Obvious examples are reports, correspondence, drawings and specifications but could equally include EIRs.
The third aspect is the continuity of classification. It is suggested that the Elements table would be used at the early stages of a project to describe needs – Heating would be an example. As the project progresses and more detail develops, this might become Low Temperature Hot Water Heating Systems from the Systems table. Although this looks sensible in theory, there must be a connection between these two tables as a cornerstone of BIM is to build on information and not throw it away and start again. Therefore, the first part of the Elements table should match the corresponding Systems table entries to achieve this. The alternative is that the Systems table is used throughout with subsequent pairs of characters being added to reflect the increasing level of information as the project progresses.
We have discussed these issues with NBS recently and it will be interesting to see how the new classification structure accommodates them. Realistically, it is probably too late to see them reflected in the April or June releases, but more are planned for later in the year. If these issues are addressed I believe that it will be a significant step towards providing a classification system that works for all those involved.
A key factor in the success of the Innovate UK project will be the way in which the outputs are disseminated. They could be the best dPoW and classification system in the world but unless they are adequately explained they might not be adopted into common use. The phrase ‘winning hearts and minds’ seems appropriate in this case and its importance should not be underestimated.